I just happened to catch a comment on CPAC when I turned on the TV. A french radio show was on, and the caller was asked about the sponsership scandal. The caller was not upset by it saying: "Who stole the money? Quebecers. Who was in charge of the money? Quebecers."
In other words, adscam shouldn't really be much fuel for the separatist fires because the same thing would've happened in a separated Quebed.
I thought it was an interesting viewpoint.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Random shit.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(14)
-
▼
December
(14)
- Why won't Goodale Step Down?
- Sex Clubs
- Layton
- Adscam
- An informal request from a fellow blogger:"those a...
- More on David Wilkins
- Martin rejects U.S. ambassador's rebuke
- The question Quebecers really want answered.
- Conservative child tax benefit is totally unfair
- Young people showing more interest in politics
- Liberals to ban Disease
- Leaders debate the size of their budget "surpluses"
- Liberals announce Canada-wide ban on Crime.
- Finally sucked in
-
▼
December
(14)
5 comments:
Except for the most part it was [Liberal] Quebecers. HOwever, I'd be happy if they were happy
I think the point was, that though Bloc support may be up, there shouldn't necessarily be more of a reason to separate.
Oh - he didn't know? [Spacey]
well, you see Mr. Biazarro all Quebec Liberals will be liquidated if Quebec were to be separated. I thought that was common knowledge. Therefore, things really would be different
But what's to stop the same kind of people from getting into the PQ and doing the same kind of thing in a separate Quebec?
Mean dogs with machine guns.
That's how I keep corrupt politicians out of MY party. They are trained to kill, so no funny business.
Post a Comment